Peer review of search strategies for systematic reviews: the PRESS, history, Portuguese translation and functionality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v17i3.3351Keywords:
PRESS – translation, Search strategies, Systematic review, Bibliographic database, Peer Review, ResearchAbstract
The Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) is an instrument developed at the Canadian Agency for Drugs & Technologies in Health (CADTH) to evaluate each element of search strategies in electronic databases that may influence the evidence base of systematic reviews. The authors obtained a license to translate the PRESS into Portuguese. The objective is to contribute to the dissemination, use and subsequent implementation of PRESS, especially among librarians, to consolidate the practice of evaluating search strategies for systematic reviews. The methodology used was the experience report. It begins with the history of the construction of PRESS, followed by the report of the translation process and the functionalities of each table. The result is the availability of the PRESS version in portuguese on the CADTH page. It is concluded that the translation should have a positive impact on the quality of search strategies for systematic reviews involving Brazilian librarians.
References
ALMEIDA, P.M.V, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen for use in Brazil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. v. 80, n. 3, p. 217-223, 2022. DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0589.
BEATON, D.E. et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, v. 25, n. 24, p. 318-319, 2000. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
FERREIRA, D.M.T.P.; MARTINEZ-SILVEIRA, M.S. Avaliação das estratégias de busca com a ferramenta AMSTAR dos estudos de revisão sistemática e metanálises da área de Odontologia In: X Congresso Regional de Informação em Ciências da Saúde, 2018, São Paulo. Anais... São Paulo: Bireme/Opas/OMS, 2018. Disponível em: http://red.bvsalud.org/multimedia/resource/3073#.YheSCS271z8. Acesso em 15 fev. 2022.
HERDMAN, M.; FOX-RUSHBY, J.; BADIA, X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. Quality of Life Research, v. 7, p. 323-335, 1998. Disponível em: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/10007/1/Fulltext.pdf. Acesso em 10 dez. 2021.
MARTINEZ-SILVEIRA, M.S. Bibliotecários são parceiros valiosos em equipes de revisões sistemáticas em saúde. In: Encontro Nacional de Ensino e Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação (Cinform), 5, Salvador, 2011. Anais... Salvador: UFBA, 2011. Disponível em: https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/3696. Acesso em 5 fev. 2022.
MARTINEZ-SILVEIRA, M.S. et al. Qualidade das revisões sistemáticas brasileiras da área de saúde pública em periódicos nacionais. Tendências da Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação, v. 5, n. 1, p. 79-86, 2012. Disponível em: https://revistas.ancib.org/index.php/tpbci/article/view/276. Acesso em 10 jan. 2022.
MCGOWAN J. et al. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline explanation and elaboration (PRESS E&E). Ottawa: CADTH, 2016a. Disponível em: https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/CP0015_PRESS_Update_Report_2016.pdf. Acesso em 14 fev. 2022.
MCGOWAN J. et al. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 guideline statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, v. 75, p. 40-46, 2016b. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021.
MCGOWAN, J.; SAMPSON, M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. Journal of the Medical Library Association, v. 93, n. 1, p. 74-80, 2005. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC545125/. Acesso em 10 jan. 2022.
MCGOWAN, J.; SAMPSON, M.; LEFEBVRE, C. An evidence-based checklist for the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS EBC). Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, v. 5, n. 1, p. 149-154, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/B8SG8R.
METHLEY, A.M. et al. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Services Research, n. 14, p. 579, 2014. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0.
O'CONNOR, A.M. et al. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions. Writing the review protocol, formulating the question and searching the literature. Zoonoses and Public Health, v. 61, suppl. 1, p. 228-238, 2014. DOI: 10.1111/zph.12125.
SAMPSON M.; MCGOWAN J.; LEFEBVRE C. PRESS: Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.cadth.ca/media/pdf/477_PRESS-Peer-Review-Electronic-Search-Strategies_tr_e.pdf. Acesso em 10 fev. 2022.
SAMPSON, M. et al. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. v. 62, n. 9, p. 944-952, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.012.
SANTOS, C.M.C.; PIMENTA, C.A.M.; NOBRE, M.R.C. A Estratégia Pico para a construção da pergunta de pesquisa e busca de evidências. Revista Latino-americana de Enfermagem, Ribeirão Preto, v. 15, n. 3, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692007000300023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author’s rights: The author retains unrestricted rights over his work.
Rights to reuse: Reciis adopts the Creative Commons License, CC BY-NC non-commercial attribution according to the Policy on Open Access to Knowledge by Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. With this license, access, download, copy, print, share, reuse, and distribution of articles is allowed, provided that it is for non-commercial use and with source citation, granting proper authorship credits and reference to Reciis. In such cases, no permission is required from the authors or editors.
Rights of authors’s deposit / self-archiving: The authors are encouraged to deposit the published version, along with the link of their article in Reciis, in institutional repositories.
