“Unfortunately, we couldn’t reach a definitive diagnosis”: the interactional management of uncertainty in genetic counseling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v18i3.4315Palavras-chave:
Uncertainty, Medical diagnosis, Doctor-patient interaction, Conversation analysis, Genetic counselingResumo
This paper examines how participants in genetic counseling sessions interactionally manage situations where the results of tests to investigate the causes of identified fetal malformations are inconclusive or missing. The dataset consists of 54 audio-recorded interactions at a unit specialized in moderate- and high-risk pregnancies at a Brazilian public hospital. Conversation analysis was used to examine the data, revealing that the participants deployed interactional actions that exhibited highly negative valence toward diagnostic inconclusiveness, demonstrating that when there is a motivation for a medical examination, insofar as its results will serve as a basis for subsequent decision-making (in this case about future pregnancies), there is a preference for bad diagnostic news over absent or inconclusive diagnostic news. These findings are consistent with prior interactional studies.
Referências
ARRIBAS-AYLLON, Michael; SARANGI, Srikant. Counselling uncertainty: genetics professionals’ accounts of (non)directiveness and trust/distrust. Health Risk & Society, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 2, p. 171-184, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2014.884545. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13698575.2014.884545. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
BROOKES-HOWELL, Lucy Claire. Living without labels: the interactional management of diagnostic uncertainty in the genetic counselling clinic. Social Science & Medicine, Oxford, v. 63, v. 12, p. 3080-3091, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.008. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953606004102. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
BRUMFIT, Christopher. Teacher professionalism and research. In: COOK, Guy; SEIDLHOFER, Barbara (ed). Principle and practice in applied linguistics: studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. p. 27-41.
DECRUYENAERE, Marleen et al. Psychological distress in the 5-year period after predictive testing for Huntington's disease. European Journal of Human Genetics, v. 11, n. 1, p. 30-38, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200913. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/5200913. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
FOX, Renée C. Medical uncertainty revisited. In: ALBRECHT, Gary L.; FITZPATRICK, Ray; SCRIMSHAW, Susan C. (ed). Handbook of social studies in health and medicine. London: SAGE Publications, 2000. p. 409-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608412. Available from: https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/hdbk_socstudyhealth/n26.xml. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
GAIL, J. Transcript notation. In: ATKINSON, J.; HERITAGE John. Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984. p. ix-xvi.
HEATH, Christian. The delivery and reception of diagnosis in the general-practice consultation. In: DREW, Paul; HERITAGE, John (ed). Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. p. 235-267.
HOROVITZ, Dafne Dain Gandelman et al. Genetic services and testing in Brazil. Journal of Community Genetics, Heidelberg, v. 4, n. 3, p. 355–375, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-012-0096-y. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12687-012-0096-y. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
KUKLA, Rebecca. How do patients know? Hastings Center Report, Hastings-on-Hudson, v. 37, n. 5, p. 27-35, 2007. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4625777. Accessed: Mar 29, 2024.
LEE, Seung Hee. Response design in conversation. In: SIDNELL, Jack; STIVERS, Tanya (ed). The handbook of conversation analysis. Oxford, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. p. 415-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch20. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118325001.ch20. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
MAYNARD, Douglas W. ‘Does it mean I’m gonna die?’: on meaning assessment in the delivery of diagnostic news. Social Science & Medicine, Oxford, v. 62, n. 8, p. 1902-16, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.09.011. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/ld/a/QFbTGZX7CxCjLqt9TKxzxjr. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
MAYNARD, Douglas W. On “realization” in everyday life: the forecasting of bad news as a social relation. American Sociological Review, [s. l.], v. 61, n. 1, p. 109-131, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2096409. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2096409. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
MAYNARD, Douglas W.; FRANKEL, Richard M. ‘Indeterminacy and uncertainty in the delivery of diagnostic news in internal medicine: a single case analysis.’ In: GLENN, Phillip J.; LEBARON Curtis D.; MANDELBAUM, Jennifer (ed). Studies in Language and Social Interaction: in honor of Robert Hopper. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003. p. 393-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606969. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781410606969-31/indeterminacy-uncertainty-delivery-diagnostic-news-internal-medicine-single-case-analysis. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
MAYNARD, Douglas W.; FRANKEL, Richard M. On diagnostic rationality: bad news, good news, and the symptom residue. In: HERITAGE, John; MAYNARD, Douglas W. (ed.). Communication in medical care: interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. p. 248-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172.011. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/communication-in-medical-care/on-diagnostic-rationality-bad-news-good-news-and-the-symptom-residue/9975DB6EC1796BA5A747ECE8A6AD7042. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
OSTERMANN, Ana Cristina. Women’s (limited) agency over their sexual bodies: Contesting contraceptive recommendations in Brazil. Social Science & Medicine, Oxford, v. 290, p. 114276, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114276. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953621006080. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
OSTERMANN, Ana Cristina. Uma mulher, um feto, e uma má notícia: a entrega de diagnósticos de síndromes e de malformações fetais – em busca de uma melhor compreensão do que está por vir e do que pode ser feito. 2013-present. São Leopoldo, 2013. Projeto de Pesquisa financiado pelo CNPq.
OSTERMANN, Ana Cristina; FREZZA, Minéia. 'Veio o resultado do exame': A comunicação de notícias diagnósticas (e como investigações linguístico-interacionais podem informar as práticas profissionais). Linguagem em (Dis)curso, Tubarão, v. 17, n. 1, p. 25-50, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-170102-0516. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/ld/a/QFbTGZX7CxCjLqt9TKxzxjr. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
PERÄKYLÄ, Anssi. Communicating and responding to diagnosis. In: HERITAGE, John; MAYNARD, Douglas W. (ed). Communication in medical care: interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. p. 214-247. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/communication-in-medical-care/communicating-and-responding-to-diagnosis/2F9A79F9575230064F1D6BBD89A1F06E. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
PILNICK, Alison; ZAYTS, Olga. ‘‘It’s just a likelihood’’: uncertainty as topic and resource in conveying ‘‘positive’’ results in an antenatal screening clinic. Symbolic Interaction, [s. l.], v. 37, n. 2, p. 187-208, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.99. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/symb.99. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
RAPP, Reyna. Testing women, testing the fetus: the social impact of amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge, 1999.
ROBINSON, Jeffrey D. An interactional structure of medical activities during acute visits and its implications for patients’ participation. Health Communication, [s. l.], v. 15, n. 1, p. 27-59, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1501_2. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327027HC1501_2. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
SACKS, Harvey. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1992. v. 1-2.
SACKS, Harvey; SCHEGLOFF, Emanuel; JEFFERSON; Gail. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, v. 50, n. 4, p. 696-735, 1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/412243. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/412243. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
SARANGI, Srikant. The spatial and temporal dimensions of reflective questions in genetic counseling. In: FREED, Alice; EHRLICH, Susan (ed). Why do you ask?: the function of questions in institutional discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. p. 235-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306897.003.0011. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/book/26059/chapter-abstract/193994716. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
SARANGI, Srikant; CLARKE, Angus. Zones of expertise and the management of uncertainty in genetics risk communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, [s. l.], v. 35, n. 2, p. 139‐171, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3502_2. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3502_2. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
SILVERMAN, David. Discourses of counselling: HIV counselling as social interaction. London: Sage, 1997.
SOUZA, Joseane; OSTERMANN, Ana Cristina. “Tudo bem”, “tudo em paz” e “uma tremenda sorte”: Avaliações positivas no gerenciamento da incerteza na comunicação entre oncologistas e pacientes com câncer de mama. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, Belo Horizonte, v. 25, n.2, p. 609-640, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.25.2.609-640. Disponível em: http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/relin/article/view/10272. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
STEVENSON, Roger E. Human malformations and related anomalies. In: STEVENSON, Roger E.; HALL, Judith G. (ed). Human malformations and related anomalies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. p. 3-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195165685.003.0001. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/book/50855/chapter-abstract/421398498. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
STIVERS, Tanya. An overview of the question response system in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, [s. l.], v. 42, n. 10, p. 2772-2781, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.011. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216610001074. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
STIVERS, Tanya; ROBINSON, Jeffrey D. A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, [s. l.], v. 35, n. 3, p. 367-392, 2006. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4169504. Accessed: Mar 29, 2024.
STIVERS, Tanya; TIMMERMANS, Stefan. Negotiating the diagnostic uncertainty of genomic test results. Social Psychology Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 79, n. 3, p. 199-221, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272516658770. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3502_2. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
TIMMERMANS, Stefan; BUCHBINDER, Mara. Patients-in-waiting: living between sickness and health in the genomics era. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Thousand Oaks, v. 51, n. 4, p. 408-423, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510386794. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022146510386794. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
ZAYTS, Olga; SARANGI, Srikant. Modes of risk explanation in telephone consultations between nurses and parents for a genetic condition. Health Risk & Society, [s. l.], v. 15, n. 2, p. 194-215, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2013.764975. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13698575.2013.764975. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
ZAYTS, Olga; SARANGI, Srikant; SCHNURR, Stephanie. The management of diagnostic uncertainty and decision-making in genetics case conferences. Communication and Medicine, Sheffield, v. 13, n. 1, p. 37-50, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.18433. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022146510386794. Accessed: Jul 29, 2024.
ZUCZKOWSKI, Andrzej et al. Communicating certainty and uncertainty in medical, supportive and scientific contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Ana Cristina Ostermann, Minéia Frezza
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Direitos de autor: O autor retém, sem restrições dos direitos sobre sua obra.
Direitos de reutilização: A Reciis adota a Licença Creative Commons, CC BY-NC atribuição não comercial conforme a Política de Acesso Aberto ao Conhecimento da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Com essa licença é permitido acessar, baixar (download), copiar, imprimir, compartilhar, reutilizar e distribuir os artigos, desde que para uso não comercial e com a citação da fonte, conferindo os devidos créditos de autoria e menção à Reciis. Nesses casos, nenhuma permissão é necessária por parte dos autores ou dos editores.
Direitos de depósito dos autores/autoarquivamento: Os autores são estimulados a realizarem o depósito em repositórios institucionais da versão publicada com o link do seu artigo na Reciis.
